There’s a moment in the New Testament that most believers read past without slowing down: Paul never sat at the feet of Peter, James, or John to learn Torah. He didn’t need to. He wasn’t a spiritual novice waiting for the “real disciples” to explain Scripture to him. He was already a master of the text they were still learning to interpret.
And if we don’t understand that, we will misunderstand almost everything Paul ever wrote.
This isn’t about elevating Paul above the apostles. It’s about recognizing the kind of man God chose to carry the gospel to the nations—a man whose entire life had been shaped by Torah long before he ever met Messiah.
This teaching matters because it reframes discipleship, authority, and the way we read the New Testament. It also confronts us with a question we rarely ask:
What happens when someone who already knows Scripture encounters the One the Scriptures point to?
—
Paul’s Training: A Life Formed by Torah, Not a Weekend Bible Study
Paul wasn’t “familiar” with Torah. He was forged by it.
– He was a Pharisee of Pharisees—a title that meant he belonged to the strictest interpretive tradition.
– He studied under Gamaliel, one of the most respected sages of the era.
– He was fluent in Hebrew Scripture, oral tradition, halakhic reasoning, and midrashic interpretation.
– He lived Torah observance from childhood, not as a convert or latecomer.
The apostles had walked with Yeshua.
Paul had walked with Torah.
These are two different kinds of authority, and the early church needed both.
When Paul says in Galatians 1 that he “did not receive [the gospel] from any man,” he wasn’t boasting. He was stating a fact: no human alive could teach him Torah better than he already knew it. What he lacked wasn’t Scripture. It was revelation.
—
What Paul Actually Needed From Yeshua
Paul didn’t need Jesus to teach him Torah.
He needed Jesus to reveal Himself in Torah.
That’s the difference.
Paul already knew the text.
He didn’t yet know the Author.
When the risen Messiah confronted him on the Damascus road, Paul didn’t receive a new religion. He received new eyes. Suddenly the Scriptures he had memorized since childhood rearranged themselves around a single burning center: Yeshua is the promised Messiah, and everything in Torah, Prophets, and Writings had been pointing to Him all along.
This is why Paul’s letters read like a rabbi who has seen the face of God.
Because that’s exactly what he was.
—
Why Paul Didn’t Need the Apostles to Disciple Him
This is where the modern church often gets uncomfortable. We like hierarchy. We like the idea that Paul needed Peter’s approval or James’s mentorship. But Scripture doesn’t say that.
Paul’s authority came from three places:
– His mastery of Torah—the apostles respected this even when they didn’t fully understand it.
– His direct commissioning by Yeshua—not secondhand, not through a committee.
– His revelation of Messiah—which aligned with the apostles but did not originate from them.
Paul wasn’t a student in the apostolic school.
He was a peer—called differently, trained differently, and sent differently.
And that difference is what made him effective.
—
Paul Taught Torah—But Through the Light of Messiah
Many Christians assume Paul abandoned Torah or replaced it with “grace.” But Paul never apologized for Torah. He never dismissed it. He never contradicted it.
Instead, he taught:
– Torah ethics
– Torah worldview
– Torah categories
– Torah promises
– Torah prophecy
All illuminated by Messiah.
Paul didn’t preach against Torah.
He preached against using Torah as a boundary marker for Gentile conversion.
He didn’t reject the Law.
He rejected the idea that the Law could save.
He didn’t abolish the commandments.
He abolished the hostility between Jew and Gentile.
Paul’s gospel wasn’t anti-Torah.
It was Torah fulfilled.
—
The Real Challenge: Paul’s Life Exposes Our Discomfort With Scripture
Here’s the part that hits home for me—and maybe for you too.
Paul didn’t need anyone to teach him Torah.
But most of us do.
We live in a world where Scripture is optional, where discipleship is casual, where spiritual formation is outsourced to pastors, podcasts, and personalities. Paul’s life confronts that. It exposes our spiritual shortcuts.
Paul shows us what happens when someone:
– immerses themselves in Scripture
– lives a disciplined life
– honors the commandments
– seeks God with their whole being
– and then encounters Messiah
The result is authority—not borrowed, not inherited, not imitated.
Authority that comes from revelation and obedience.
—
Living This Teaching Today
This is where it becomes personal for me.
I live this teaching because I’ve learned that revelation doesn’t replace Scripture—it deepens it. I’ve learned that encountering Messiah doesn’t erase Torah—it fulfills it. I’ve learned that discipleship isn’t about finding someone to spoon-feed you—it’s about letting God reshape your entire worldview.
Paul didn’t need Peter to teach him Torah.
But he did need community.
He did need accountability.
He did need brothers who could confirm the revelation he received.
And so do we.
The goal isn’t to become independent.
The goal is to become rooted.
Rooted in Scripture.
Rooted in Messiah.
Rooted in community.
Rooted in calling.
—
How to Apply This Teaching to Your Life
– Return to Scripture with fresh eyes. Don’t read it for information; read it for revelation.
– Stop outsourcing your spiritual formation. Let God teach you directly through His Word.
– Honor the roots of your faith. Paul didn’t abandon Torah; he saw it fulfilled.
– Seek revelation, not shortcuts. Let Messiah illuminate what you already know.
– Live with the courage of someone who has been called, not someone waiting for permission.
—
A Final Word
Paul’s story isn’t about a man who didn’t need teachers.
It’s about a man who let God Himself be his Teacher.
And that invitation is still open.
If this teaching stirred something in you, I’d love to hear your thoughts. Drop a comment, share this with someone who’s wrestling with Paul, and let’s keep growing together in the Word.
Chavurat Derekh HaMashiach
Living the Journey, Sharing the WORD
recent posts
- Ekev • Isaiah 49:14–51:3 • Matthew 4 & Luke 4 • James 5
- Kenny’s Vanlife Torah Lesson — Abiding on the Road
- Kenny’s Vanlife Torah Lessons — Parashat Chukat When the Water Dries Up and the Father Redirects the Road
- Kenny, the Road, and the Bread of Life
- How to Understand the Bible on the Road — A Vanlife Guide Told by Kenny the Three‑Legged Shepherd
about
-
-
When I finally slowed down and read Yeshua’s words without the filters I inherited from church tradition, something became painfully obvious: He never taught anyone to break Torah. Not once. Not subtly. Not symbolically. Not in a parable. Not in a vision. Not in a debate.
And the two passages that make this clearest are the ones I used to skip over:
> “Whoever breaks the least of these commands and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the Kingdom.”
> — Matthew 5:19
> “Why do you transgress the command of Elohim for the sake of your tradition?”
> — Matthew 15:3
If Yeshua said the least in the Kingdom are the ones who break even the least of the commandments and teach others to do the same… why would He turn around and do exactly that?
Why would He rebuke the Pharisees for replacing Torah with tradition… and then replace Torah with tradition Himself?
He wouldn’t.
And He didn’t.
The idea that Yeshua declared pork clean doesn’t come from Yeshua.
It came from later interpretations, often built on mistranslations, assumptions, and the theology I inherited and repeated for years.
I know the arguments Christians use to justify abandoning the dietary laws — because I used them myself. And I know the arguments Torah‑keepers use to defend clean eating — because I learned them after I stopped defending tradition and started defending Scripture.
Let’s walk through the angles.
—
Peter’s Vision: The Most Misused Passage — And Peter Explains It Three Times
If Yeshua supposedly declared pork clean, why didn’t Peter know?
Years after the resurrection, Peter says:
> “I have never eaten anything unclean.”
> — Acts 10:14
Not “I used to, but Jesus changed it.”
Not “I’m free now, but I choose not to.”
Not “I stopped because of tradition.”
Never.
And when Peter finally understands the vision, he explains its meaning three separate times:
– Acts 10:28 — “God has shown me that I should not call any man unclean.”
– Acts 11:12 — The Spirit told him to go with the Gentiles “without misgivings.”
– Acts 11:17–18 — The conclusion: God has granted repentance to the Gentiles.
Not once does Peter say, “God told me pigs are food now.”
He doesn’t even hint at it.
The sheet wasn’t about diet.
It was about people.
And Peter himself says so — repeatedly.
—
Paul’s Confrontation With Peter: Not About Pork, But About Hypocrisy
I used to think Paul rebuking Peter in Galatians 2 proved Torah didn’t matter.
But the issue wasn’t food.
It wasn’t pork.
It wasn’t shellfish.
It was hypocrisy.
Peter ate with Gentiles — not what they ate.
And when the “circumcision group” arrived, he withdrew to avoid criticism.
Paul wasn’t angry because Peter kept Torah.
Paul was angry because Peter acted like Gentile believers were second‑class citizens.
The rebuke was about unity, not diet.
—
Paul’s Letters to Gentiles: The Passages I Once Twisted Without Realizing It
I know these arguments well because I used them myself.
Romans 14 — “Let each be convinced in his own mind.”
I used to quote this as if Paul was talking about pork.
He wasn’t.
Romans 14 is about:
– fasting days
– vegetarian believers avoiding meat sold in pagan markets
– disputes over food sacrificed to idols
The “unclean” in Romans 14 is ceremonial, not Levitical.
Paul never uses akathartos (biblically unclean).
He uses koinos (common, defiled by handling).
Two different categories.
Galatians — “You are not under the law.”
I used to think this meant Torah was abolished.
But Paul is talking about:
– justification
– circumcision as a requirement for salvation
– returning to paganism
He even says:
> “The law is holy, and the commandment is holy, righteous, and good.”
> — Romans 7:12
And:
> “Do we then nullify the law through faith? May it never be! On the contrary, we establish the law.”
> — Romans 3:31
Paul wasn’t anti‑Torah.
He was anti‑legalism and anti‑ethnic gatekeeping.
—
The Classic Christian Arguments — And Why They Don’t Hold Up
These are the ones I used to use:
“Jesus declared all foods clean.” (Mark 7)
This is a translator’s note added centuries later.
The Greek doesn’t say “Jesus declared.”
It says “thus purging all foods” — referring to the digestive system.
The context?
Hand‑washing traditions, not pork.
“We’re free in Christ.”
Free from sin.
Free from condemnation.
Free from man‑made traditions.
Not free from God’s wisdom.
“Peter ate with Gentiles.”
Yes — but not pork.
Eating with someone is not the same as eating the same thing.
“Paul said everything is permissible.”
He also said not everything is beneficial.
And he never once used that phrase to justify breaking Torah.
“God looks at the heart.”
He does.
But the heart is revealed by obedience.
—
The Silence of the Pharisees: The Most Overlooked Evidence
The Pharisees accused Yeshua of everything:
– breaking Sabbath
– blasphemy
– eating with sinners
– not washing hands
– forgiving sins
– healing at the wrong time
– claiming authority
But not once did they accuse Him of:
– abolishing the food laws
– declaring pork clean
– teaching Israel to eat unclean animals
If He had even hinted at such a thing, it would have been the scandal of the century.
But there’s silence.
Because He never said it.
—
So Why Does This Matter?
Not because eating clean saves me.
Not because Torah observance earns salvation.
Not because I’m trying to be “more Jewish.”
It matters because God designed our bodies, and He knows what fuels them best.
He created us like Ferraris — precision‑built, high‑performance, finely tuned.
And most of us treat our bodies like a rusty Pinto.
Eating unclean animals isn’t a moral failure.
It’s a design issue.
It’s like pouring pancake syrup into a Ferrari’s fuel tank.
It might smell amazing.
It might even burn for a moment.
But it will destroy the engine from the inside out.
God’s instructions aren’t punishment.
They’re protection.
He’s not taking something good away from us.
He’s keeping something harmful out of us.
—
The Real Question I Had to Face
At the end of the day, it came down to this:
Do I follow what feels good to me, or what God says is good for me?
Not to earn salvation.
Not to impress anyone.
Not to be “holier.”
But because the Creator knows how His creation runs best.
And because Yeshua — the One I claim to follow — never broke Torah, never taught others to break it, and never contradicted His Father.
The choice is simple:
Follow the Messiah who upheld God’s Word… or follow traditions that contradict it.
Which voice are you following?
—
If this stirred something in you, take one small step today:
Ask the Father to show you where tradition has replaced truth — and give you the courage to follow His instructions with joy, not fear. You don’t have to convert to anything. You don’t have to join a movement. Just take one step closer to Him in your own walk, in your own theology, in your own time. -
that His mission is not to erase the Torah or the Prophets but to bring them to their intended fullness. That single sentence is the hinge between Sinai and the Kingdom, between the written Torah and the living Torah standing on the mountain.
—
What Yeshua Meant in His First‑Century Jewish Context
Yeshua is speaking as a Jewish rabbi to a Jewish audience steeped in Torah. When He says:
> “Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets… I came to fulfill them.”
He is correcting a rumor: that His teachings of mercy, healing, and kingdom life meant He was discarding Moses. In rabbinic language:
– To “abolish” Torah meant to misinterpret it or teach it wrongly.
– To “fulfill” Torah meant to interpret it correctly and live it out faithfully.
So Yeshua is saying: “Don’t misunderstand Me. I’m not lowering the standard. I’m showing you what the Torah actually looks like when it’s lived with the heart of God.”
This aligns with the broader teaching that not even the smallest letter of Torah loses relevance until “all is accomplished” (Matt 5:18).
—
How Yeshua “Fulfills” the Torah
Fulfillment is not cancellation. It is completion, embodiment, and revelation.
– He fulfills the prophetic promises—Messiah, suffering servant, king, shepherd.
– He fulfills the sacrificial system—not by erasing it, but by becoming the once‑for‑all offering it pointed toward.
– He fulfills the ethical heart of Torah—showing that murder begins with anger, adultery begins with lust, and righteousness begins with the heart.
– He fulfills the covenant mission—Israel’s calling to be a light to the nations becomes embodied in Him and extended to His disciples.
This is why many scholars note that Yeshua “completes” or “brings to fullness” the Torah rather than nullifying it.
—
What This Means for Us in the 21st Century
For modern believers—Jewish and Gentile—Matthew 5:17 is not a relic. It is a compass.
1. The Torah still reveals God’s character
Yeshua didn’t discard the commandments because they still show us:
– God’s justice
– God’s holiness
– God’s compassion
– God’s priorities for human relationships
The Law is not our means of salvation, but it remains our teacher of God’s heart.
2. We follow Torah through the Messiah, not apart from Him
We don’t keep commandments to earn righteousness; we walk in them because:
– The Spirit writes God’s ways on our hearts
– Yeshua models how to live them with mercy, truth, and love
– The New Covenant empowers obedience from the inside out
3. The moral vision of Torah is intensified, not relaxed
Yeshua raises the bar:
– Anger becomes a heart issue
– Lust becomes a heart issue
– Love extends even to enemies
– Reconciliation becomes urgent
He doesn’t loosen the commandments—He deepens them.
4. Gentile believers are grafted into Israel’s story
Matthew 5:17 reminds Gentiles that:
– Their faith is rooted in Israel’s Scriptures
– Their Messiah is Israel’s Messiah
– Their discipleship is shaped by the same God who spoke at Sinai
This doesn’t mean Gentiles become Jews; it means they inherit the blessings and responsibilities of being part of God’s covenant family.
5. The Kingdom life is Torah-shaped
Yeshua’s teachings in Matthew 5–7 are not “new laws” replacing old ones. They are the Torah interpreted through the Messiah’s authority.
—
A Messianic Application for Today
For a 21st‑century disciple, Matthew 5:17 calls you to:
– Honor the Hebrew Scriptures as foundational, not optional.
– Read Torah through the lens of Yeshua, not instead of Him.
– Let the Spirit form your character, not just your behavior.
– Live as a light to the nations, just as Israel was called to do.
– Embrace the continuity between the Old and New Covenants rather than treating them as opposites.
The Torah is not a burden; it is a window into the heart of the One who saved you. -
For most of my Christian life, I believed Galatians “shut down” Sabbath observance. I used the same argument many Christians still use today:
> “Paul said, ‘You observe days and months and seasons and years.’
> That means Sabbath is obsolete.”
I quoted it confidently. I thought it was airtight.
And then one day, I slowed down and actually read the context.
That’s when everything changed.
This article is for anyone who has ever used Galatians 4:10 the way I did—or has had it used against them—to argue that Christians should not observe the Sabbath or any part of Torah.
The Problem: We Read Galatians Like Paul Was Talking to Jews
Most Christians (including the old me) read Galatians as if Paul is rebuking Torah‑keeping Jews for going back to the Law.
But Paul says something that makes that interpretation impossible:
> “Formerly, when you did not know God, you were slaves to those which by nature are not gods.”
> — Galatians 4:8
Who is he talking to?
Not Jews.
Not Torah‑keepers.
Not Sabbath‑keepers.
He’s talking to former pagans.
People who worshiped idols.
People who followed astrological calendars.
People who had feast days for Zeus, Artemis, Dionysus, and the emperor.
People who practiced ritual fasting and food restrictions tied to pagan gods.
These Gentiles had never kept the Sabbath in their lives.
So when Paul says:
> “You observe days and months and seasons and years…”
> — Galatians 4:10
…he cannot possibly be talking about the Sabbath.
You can’t “return” to something you never practiced.
What Pagan Calendars Looked Like
This is the part I never learned in church.
Greco‑Roman religion had:
– feast days for gods
– lucky and unlucky days
– astrological seasons
– ritual fast days
– new moon omens
– annual festivals tied to deities
– food restrictions connected to idol worship
Paul isn’t saying:
> “Stop keeping the Sabbath.”
He’s saying:
> “Don’t go back to the pagan calendar system you came out of.”
Once you see that, Galatians 4:10 stops being a weapon against Sabbath observance.
Paul’s Real Issue: Justification, Not Obedience
The entire book of Galatians is about one thing:
Gentiles being pressured to adopt Jewish identity markers (circumcision, food laws, calendar) as a requirement for salvation and belonging.
Paul is not attacking the practices themselves.
He is attacking the misuse of them.
If Sabbath becomes a badge of justification, Paul says no.
If Sabbath becomes a rhythm of worship, rest, and identity in Messiah, Paul never condemns it.
How do we know?
Because Paul himself kept the Sabbath his entire life (Acts 13:14; 17:2; 18:4).
Whatever Galatians means, it cannot mean “Sabbath is obsolete.”
Acts 15 Actually Supports Sabbath, Not Abolishes It
This is the part most Christians skip.
James says:
> “For Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogues every Sabbath.”
> — Acts 15:21
James assumes:
– Gentiles will attend synagogue
– Gentiles will hear Moses taught
– Gentiles will grow into the ways of God over time
Acts 15 gives Gentiles minimum entry requirements, not a maximum ceiling.
It’s not “Don’t keep Sabbath.”
It’s “Start here, and you’ll learn the rest every Sabbath as you grow.”
So Is the Sabbath Still Applicable?
Yes—because:
– Paul never abolishes it.
– Galatians 4:10 is about pagan observances, not Torah.
– Acts 15 assumes ongoing Sabbath gatherings.
– Paul himself kept Sabbath.
– Sabbath predates Sinai (Genesis 2).
– Sabbath is part of creation, not just Israel.
The only thing Paul rejects is using Sabbath as a requirement for justification or as a boundary marker to divide Jew and Gentile.
Sabbath as worship?
Sabbath as rest?
Sabbath as identity in Messiah?
Paul never shuts that down.
Why This Matters for Christians Today
I used to argue against Sabbath because I thought Paul did.
But once I realized Paul was talking to pagans, not Torah‑keepers, the whole argument fell apart.
The Sabbath isn’t a burden.
It isn’t legalism.
It isn’t obsolete.
It’s a gift.
A rhythm.
A creation blessing.
A sign of God’s covenant faithfulness.
A weekly reminder that we are not slaves to Pharaoh, Rome, or modern life.
And nothing in Galatians changes that.
If this helped you rethink Galatians or gave you language for conversations you’ve had yourself, leave a comment and share this article with someone who’s wrestling through the same questions. Your voice helps others find clarity too. -
Assumptions don’t appear out of thin air. They are born somewhere—shaped by stories we didn’t choose, moments we didn’t understand, and interpretations we didn’t realize we were making. By the time we’re adults, assumptions feel automatic, almost instinctive. But instinct is often just memory wearing a disguise.
If Chapter 1 explored what an assumption is, this chapter explores where it comes from—because you can’t dismantle what you don’t understand.
—
The Early Formation of Assumptions
Long before we have language for our experiences, we begin forming patterns. A child who grows up in a loud, unpredictable home learns to read tone like a survival skill. A child who grows up in silence learns to fill in the blanks with imagination. A child who grows up around anger learns to anticipate danger. A child who grows up around avoidance learns to interpret distance as rejection.
None of these children are “wrong.”
They’re simply adapting.
But adaptation becomes interpretation.
Interpretation becomes expectation.
Expectation becomes assumption.
And assumptions become the lens through which we see the world.
—
The Brain’s Need to Fill the Gaps
The human mind hates uncertainty. When something is unclear, the brain rushes to complete the picture. It fills in missing information with whatever feels familiar—even if familiar isn’t healthy.
– Someone doesn’t text back → “They must be upset.”
– A friend sounds short → “I must have done something wrong.”
– God feels silent → “He must be disappointed in me.”
The brain isn’t trying to deceive you.
It’s trying to protect you.
But protection built on old wounds becomes a prison.
—
The Emotional Cost of Unexamined Assumptions
Assumptions don’t just distort situations—they distort you.
They create:
– unnecessary anxiety
– relational tension
– spiritual confusion
– emotional exhaustion
– false narratives that feel true
Most people don’t realize how much energy they spend managing stories that never actually happened.
You’re not just reacting to the moment—you’re reacting to every moment that ever felt like this one.
That’s why assumptions feel so powerful.
They’re not about the present.
They’re about the past pretending to be the present.
—
Spiritual Assumptions: The Most Dangerous Kind
We don’t only make assumptions about people—we make them about God.
– “If life is hard, God must be punishing me.”
– “If I don’t feel anything in prayer, God must be distant.”
– “If I fail, God must be disappointed.”
These assumptions don’t come from Scripture.
They come from experience—especially painful experience.
A silent parent becomes a silent God.
A harsh authority figure becomes a harsh God.
A conditional relationship becomes a conditional God.
We don’t see God as He is.
We see Him as we were taught to expect.
And until we examine those expectations, we will confuse our assumptions with His character.
—
Why This Matters
You cannot heal what you cannot name.
You cannot grow beyond what you cannot see.
You cannot change a pattern you don’t realize you’re repeating.
Understanding the birthplace of your assumptions is the first step toward freedom.
Not because it excuses the pattern—but because it reveals it.
And once something is revealed, it can be rewritten.
—
If this spoke to you…
I’d love to hear what part of this chapter connected with your own story.
Feel free to comment, share, or pass it along to someone who might be carrying assumptions they never chose.
And stay tuned—there’s a new community space forming soon for those who want to walk this journey with others. -
Most people imagine resilience as the ability to push harder, endure longer, or grit their teeth through impossible circumstances. But the kind of resilience Scripture reveals is quieter, stranger, and far more human. It’s not the strength of a warrior—it’s the strength of someone who refuses to walk away from a calling that hurts.
Resilience in the Bible rarely looks heroic. It looks like Moses arguing with God in the wilderness. It looks like Jeremiah weeping. It looks like David hiding in caves. It looks like Yeshua withdrawing to lonely places to pray. It looks like people who stay in the story even when the story breaks their heart.
And maybe that’s the part we forget: resilience isn’t the absence of breaking. It’s the refusal to let breaking become the end of the story.
—
The Myth of the Unshakeable Person
We tend to admire people who look unbothered—people who never flinch, never question, never show weakness. But Scripture doesn’t give us a single unshakeable hero. Not one.
Moses begs God to send someone else.
Elijah collapses under a broom tree and asks to die.
Jonah runs.
Jeremiah cries so much he’s nicknamed “the weeping prophet.”
Even Yeshua says, “My soul is overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of death.”
If the Son of God Himself felt the weight of His calling, why do we assume resilience means pretending we don’t?
Real resilience is not emotional numbness.
It’s emotional honesty.
—
The Resilience That Comes From Wrestling
There’s a pattern woven through Scripture: God doesn’t form resilient people by removing struggle—He forms them through it.
Jacob becomes Israel after wrestling all night.
Moses becomes a leader after forty years in Midian.
David becomes a king while running for his life.
Paul becomes an apostle through weakness, not strength.
Resilience is not the product of comfort.
It’s the fruit of wrestling with God and refusing to let go.
And here’s the part we rarely say out loud: resilience is not something you “achieve.” It’s something God grows in you while you’re convinced you’re failing.
—
The Quiet Strength of Staying
Sometimes the bravest thing you can do is stay when everything in you wants to run.
Stay in the conversation.
Stay in the calling.
Stay in the healing process.
Stay in the place where God is shaping you.
Stay in the story long enough to see what God does next.
Resilience isn’t loud.
It’s not glamorous.
It’s not Instagrammable.
It’s the quiet decision to remain faithful when faithfulness feels like loss.
—
When You Don’t Feel Strong Enough
Maybe you’re in a season where you feel stretched thin.
Maybe you’re tired of being the strong one.
Maybe you’re wondering if you misheard God because the path is harder than you expected.
If that’s you, hear this gently:
Resilience is not something you muster.
It’s something God supplies.
Your job is not to be unbreakable.
Your job is to stay open.
Open to God.
Open to growth.
Open to the possibility that this season is forming something in you that comfort never could.
—
A Closing Thought
Resilience is not about becoming someone who never falls.
It’s about becoming someone who rises differently.
Someone softer.
Someone wiser.
Someone more compassionate.
Someone who knows what it feels like to be held by God in the middle of the storm.
If you’re in that storm right now, you’re not failing.
You’re being formed.
—
If this spoke to you…
I’d love to hear your thoughts.
What part of this resonated with your own journey?
Feel free to comment, share, or pass it along to someone who needs a reminder that resilience doesn’t always look like strength—it often looks like staying.
And keep an eye out… a new community space is coming soon for those who want to walk this path together. -
When Glory Returns and the Name Is Revealed
Part One of Ki Tissa ended with Moshe standing in the aftermath of Israel’s greatest national collapse—the Golden Calf. The covenant was shattered, the tablets broken, and the people unsure whether HaShem would remain with them.
Moshe interceded, pleaded, and then asked the boldest request any human ever made:
> “Show me Your glory.” (Exodus 33:18)
HaShem agreed—but with a boundary. Moshe was placed in the cleft of the rock, covered by the hand of God, and allowed to see only the afterglow of divine presence. HaShem said:
> “You cannot see My face, for no one can see Me and live.” (Exodus 33:20)
That moment prepares us for one of the most important revelations in all Scripture.
The First Time God Reveals His Name Fully (Exodus 34:6–7)
When Moshe returns to the mountain with new tablets, HaShem descends in a cloud and proclaims His Name—not just the four letters, but the meaning behind them.
> “YHVH, YHVH, El compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, abundant in lovingkindness and truth, keeping mercy to thousands, forgiving iniquity, transgression, and sin; yet by no means clearing the guilty…”
> (Exodus 34:6–7)
This is the first time in the entire Bible that HaShem defines His Name.
– Compassionate — He feels the suffering of His people.
– Gracious — He gives what is not earned.
– Slow to anger — He restrains judgment.
– Abounding in covenant love — His loyalty outlasts human failure.
– Faithful — He keeps His promises.
– Just — He does not ignore sin.
This becomes the most quoted description of God in the entire Tanakh (Numbers 14:18; Nehemiah 9:17; Psalm 103:8; Joel 2:13; Jonah 4:2).
The prophets don’t invent new theology—they echo this moment.
But Didn’t HaShem Say No One Can See His Face?
This is the tension many readers feel.
Exodus 33:20
“No one can see My face and live.”
Yet Scripture also says:
– Jacob: “I have seen God face to face” (Genesis 32:30)
– Moses: “HaShem spoke to Moses face to face” (Exodus 33:11)
– The elders: “They saw the God of Israel” (Exodus 24:10–11)
– Isaiah: “My eyes have seen the King, YHVH of Hosts” (Isaiah 6:5)
Is this a contradiction?
No—because “face” has two meanings in Scripture.
1. “Face” as God’s unfiltered essence
This is what Exodus 33:20 refers to.
No human can behold the infinite, unmediated, unshielded glory of the Eternal One.
This is why Moshe is hidden in the rock.
This is why Isaiah cries out, “Woe is me!” (Isaiah 6:5).
This is why Ezekiel collapses (Ezekiel 1:28).
The fullness of God’s essence is too overwhelming for mortal flesh.
2. “Face” as God’s manifested, relational presence
Throughout the Tanakh, HaShem appears in visible, embodied forms:
– The Angel of HaShem who speaks as God and receives worship (Exodus 3:2–6; Judges 6:11–24).
– The Man who wrestles Jacob (Genesis 32:24–30).
– The Commander of HaShem’s armies who receives worship from Joshua (Joshua 5:13–15).
– The Glory of HaShem appearing in human-like form (Ezekiel 1:26–28).
These are not metaphors.
The text describes physical encounters.
The B’rit Chadashah clarifies the pattern:
– “No one has ever seen God; the only Son… has made Him known.” (John 1:18)
– “He is the exact representation of His being.” (Hebrews 1:3)
– “The Messiah is the visible image of the invisible God.” (Colossians 1:15)
The invisible essence of HaShem cannot be seen.
But HaShem can and does reveal Himself in visible, embodied form.
This is how Jacob, Moses, Isaiah, and others survive.
They are not seeing the infinite essence—they are seeing HaShem as He chooses to reveal Himself.
Elijah and the Haftarah: When HaShem Vindicates His Name (1 Kings 18:1–39)
The Haftarah mirrors Ki Tissa’s themes:
– Israel sins.
– A mediator intercedes.
– HaShem reveals Himself.
– The people return to the covenant.
On Mount Carmel, Elijah confronts a nation that has made its own “golden calf”—Baal.
Just as Moshe stood between Israel and judgment, Elijah stands alone against 450 prophets.
And HaShem answers with fire from heaven (1 Kings 18:38).
The people fall on their faces and cry:
> “YHVH—He is God! YHVH—He is God!” (1 Kings 18:39)
The Name revealed in Exodus 34 is vindicated again.
The B’rit Chadashah: The Glory Returns in Yeshua
Paul directly references Ki Tissa when he writes:
> “If the ministry that came with glory…
> how much more glorious is the ministry of the Spirit?”
> (2 Corinthians 3:7–18)
Moshe’s face shone with reflected glory.
Believers are transformed by indwelling glory.
John echoes the same theme:
> “The Word became flesh and tabernacled among us,
> and we beheld His glory.”
> (John 1:14)
The glory that passed by Moshe now walks among people.
The Name proclaimed in Exodus 34 is embodied in Yeshua:
– Compassionate (Matthew 9:36)
– Gracious (John 8:11)
– Slow to anger (Luke 9:54–56)
– Abounding in steadfast love (John 13:1)
– Faithful (Revelation 19:11)
– Just (Acts 17:31)
The God who hid Moshe in the rock now reveals Himself through the Son.
Living This Today: The Name That Shapes Us
1. HaShem’s character is the anchor, not our performance
Israel failed spectacularly with the Golden Calf.
Yet HaShem revealed His Name after their failure.
Your worst moment does not cancel His covenant love.
2. HaShem still meets us in the “cleft of the rock”
We often want full clarity, full answers, full revelation.
But HaShem gives us what we can bear—enough to trust Him, not enough to control Him.
3. Glory transforms us more than effort
Like Moshe, we reflect what we behold.
Transformation flows from presence, not pressure.
4. Mercy and justice are not opposites
Exodus 34 holds both together.
A mature walk embraces compassion and accountability.
Choose one area of your life where you feel like Israel at the Golden Calf—ashamed, impatient, or spiritually scattered.
Bring it before HaShem, using the Name He revealed:
– Compassionate
– Gracious
– Slow to anger
– Abounding in steadfast love
– Faithful
– Just
Ask Him to reveal His glory—not the full face you cannot bear, but the afterglow that guides your next step.
Then choose one practice this week that places you in the “cleft of the rock”:
– Ten minutes of Scripture meditation
– A Sabbath pause
– A journal entry naming where you’ve seen His compassion
– A conversation where you extend grace
– A moment of worship where you simply sit in His presence
Let the glory that transformed Moshe begin to transform you. -
Communication is fragile. A single text message can sound encouraging in the morning and insulting at night, not because the words changed, but because we did. We fill in the blanks with our mood, our fears, our expectations.
We do the same thing with Scripture.
Every time we approach the Word, we bring our upbringing, our wounds, our denominational lenses, and our assumptions. And unless we’re honest about that, we risk reading our own voice into God’s mouth.
This is the difference between eisegesis and exegesis:
– Eisegesis reads into the text what we already believe.
– Exegesis draws out of the text what God actually said.
Charles Spurgeon warned about this long before smartphones existed:
> “Do not give heed to any man who reads his own mind into the Scriptures, but to the man who lets the Scriptures speak for themselves.”
> —Charles Spurgeon
—
When Someone Puts Words in Your Mouth
Think of a time someone misunderstood your intentions. Maybe they assumed your tone or motive. Maybe they accused you of something you never said. That sting you felt? That frustration?
That’s exactly what we do to God when we project our assumptions onto His Word.
A.W. Tozer captured this danger clearly:
> “What comes into our minds when we think about God is the most important thing about us.”
> —A.W. Tozer
Because what we assume about God shapes what we think He meant.
—
Assumptions vs. Facts
An assumption is a belief accepted as true without evidence.
A fact is a truth that remains true whether you believe it or not.
John MacArthur put it bluntly:
> “The greatest danger in interpreting Scripture is assuming you already know what it means.”
> —John MacArthur
Assumptions feel solid because they’re familiar. Facts are solid because they’re true.
—
The Echo Chamber of Belief
When we approach Scripture to confirm what we already believe, we aren’t studying—we’re searching for an echo.
Jesus confronted this repeatedly:
> “You have heard it said… but I say to you…” (Matthew 5)
He wasn’t correcting Scripture. He was correcting assumptions about Scripture.
Beth Moore describes this beautifully:
> “If we approach the Bible looking only for what we already believe, we will never be changed by it.”
> —Beth Moore
The Word is meant to transform us, not validate us.
—
A Case Study: Philippians 4:13
> “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.”
Most of us have heard this used as a motivational slogan—athletics, business, personal goals. But when you read the entire chapter, Paul is talking about contentment in suffering, not achievement in success.
Joyce Meyer often reminds her listeners:
> “Philippians 4:13 is not about winning. It’s about enduring.”
> —Joyce Meyer
Context dismantles assumption.
Tony Evans adds:
> “A text without a context is a pretext for a proof text.”
> —Tony Evans
In other words, if you rip a verse out of its setting, you can make it say anything you want.
—
The Posture of Exegesis
Exegesis invites us to:
– listen instead of assume
– observe instead of react
– surrender instead of control
– discover instead of defend
Billy Graham summarized this posture simply:
> “The Bible is the authority. Not my feelings. Not my opinions. Not my traditions.”
> —Billy Graham
When we let Scripture speak, it often surprises us. Sometimes it confronts us. Sometimes it comforts us. But it always transforms us.
—
Study Guide
1. Recall a time someone misunderstood your intentions.
How did it feel to have “words put in your mouth”?
Write a few sentences about that moment and how it parallels what we sometimes do to God.
2. Define “Assumption.”
Then define “Fact.”
Write one example of each from your own life.
3. Exercise: Philippians 4:13
– Write down what you’ve always believed the verse meant.
– Read the entire chapter.
– Write down what Paul is actually talking about.
– Compare the two.
– What changed? What surprised you?
Here are comma‑separated hashtags tailored to this article’s themes: interpretation, exegesis vs eisegesis, assumptions, Scripture study, and spiritual growth. They’re tuned for Facebook, Instagram, and your blog ecosystem. -
A man recently accused me of saying something I never said. He filled in the blanks with his own assumptions, then argued with the version of me he created in his head. And as frustrating as that moment was, it reminded me of something far bigger:
We do the exact same thing to Scripture.
We hear a phrase, a verse, or a sermon, and our minds instantly supply the rest. We respond to our assumptions, not the actual text. Then we defend those assumptions as if they were handed down from Sinai.
This isn’t a “church problem.”
It’s a human problem.
—
How We Mishear God the Same Way We Mishear Each Other
If we can twist each other’s words in real time—while texting, talking, or debating—how much easier is it to twist a text written thousands of years ago, in a different language, culture, and worldview?
Most people don’t do it maliciously.
They do it because:
– they trust the preacher
– they trust the tradition
– they trust the denomination
– they trust the version of Christianity they inherited
But trust doesn’t equal truth.
And sincerity doesn’t equal accuracy.
Over the years, I’ve visited more denominations and fellowships than I can count. Not to judge them, but to understand them. And here’s the pattern that never changes:
– Every group has something solid.
– Every group has something off.
– Every group thinks their interpretation is the one God endorses.
Even in Hebrew Roots and Messianic circles—which, in my experience, come closest to the original context—there are still blind spots, assumptions, and traditions that slip in unnoticed.
This isn’t about attacking any group.
It’s about recognizing that no group is immune to human filters.
Most believers don’t actually test what they hear.
They assume the preacher is right.
They assume the commentary is right.
They assume the tradition is right.
But the Bereans didn’t assume.
They checked.
And they didn’t check Paul against the New Testament—it didn’t exist yet.
They checked him against the Scriptures they did have. The Tanakh and specifically the Torah
If they had to test Paul, what makes us think we don’t have to test our pastors?
Ignorance Isn’t a Sin… Until You Choose to Stay There
I don’t blame anyone for being misled.
I don’t blame anyone for inheriting traditions.
I don’t blame anyone for trusting the people who taught them.
But once you know better, you’re responsible for doing better.
Once you realize you might have been taught through someone else’s filter, you no longer have the luxury of shrugging and saying, “Well, that’s just what my church believes.”
After reading this, you can’t claim you didn’t know.
You can’t claim no one ever told you to check.
You can’t claim ignorance without admitting it’s now a choice.
If the Bible says one thing, and your preacher says another, you are not obligated to defend the preacher.
If Scripture contradicts your denomination’s tradition, you are not obligated to protect the tradition.
If the Word of God challenges what you’ve always believed, you are not obligated to cling to your comfort.
You are obligated to the truth.
And truth doesn’t fear questions.
Your Next Step
Don’t take my word for anything.
Don’t take your pastor’s word for anything.
Don’t take your denomination’s word for anything.
Read.
Study.
Compare.
Question.
Test everything.
If the Bible says something plainly, and a human being says something else, choose the One who cannot lie over the one who can be mistaken.
Your faith is too important to outsource.
Chavurat Derekh HaMashiach 